The main purpose of compostable products and packaging is to assist in the collection and diversion of food scraps to composting. This is why the Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) only certifies products and packaging associated with organic waste diversion, with the main categories being foodservice products (cups, cutlery, straws, plates, bowls, takeout containers, etc.), food scrap collection bags and bin liners, and more recently items like coffee pods/capsules.
The
main purpose of compostable products and packaging is to assist in the
collection and diversion of food scraps to composting. This is why the
Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) only certifies products and packaging
associated with organic waste diversion, with the main categories being
foodservice products (cups, cutlery, straws, plates, bowls, takeout containers,
etc.), food scrap collection bags and bin liners, and more recently items like
coffee pods/capsules.
This
has led to a widely held assumption that the only value of compostable products
is as a tool for diversion, and that there is no inherent value to the products
themselves. To investigate that assumption, the Foodservice Packaging Institute
(FPI) and BPI commissioned an in-depth study of compostable packaging as a
feedstock itself, compared to traditional inputs like yard trimmings. A field
study was designed to answer the following question:
How
does compostable foodservice packaging (FSP) compare with other conventional
organic waste stream inputs (e.g. yard trimmings, straw, wood shavings, grass,
food scraps, etc.) in its contribution to balancing targeted carbon to nitrogen
(C:N) ratios, providing nutrients, and acting as a bulking agent in compost
feedstocks?
For
contribution of carbon, the short answer is that the organic carbon in products
tested and certified to the ASTM standards must be converted into carbon
dioxide (CO2), demonstrating that the carbon can be used as food for composting
microbes, just like the conventional feedstocks a composter accepts. The
non-organic carbon components in products are just as important, and
lingo-cellulose that isn’t converted into CO2 results in the generation of
finished compost to sell.
Compost
Manufacturing Alliance (CMA) was contracted contracted to conduct full-scale
parallel field tests at two commercial composting facilities located in two
geographies, with two of the most common composting methods: aerated static
pile (ASP) at Olympic Organics (Washington state) and open windrow at A1
Organics (Colorado). For the field study, piles were super-loaded with
compostable products and evaluated for impact on the composting process (e.g.,
C:N ratio, bulk density, etc.) and quality of the finished compost (e.g.,
nutrient value, heavy metals, etc.). The results were very positive, showing
that on all factors evaluated, the compostable packaging provided the same
benefit as traditional carbon and bulking materials found in yard trimmings.